How Local is "Local"?

Dr David Boshier, a member of the BIHIP Ash Group, has just completed some EU-funded research together with Janet Stewart and Sarah Rendell, all at the Oxford Forestry Institute, on the genetics of ash. European and national guidelines currently encourage planting local tree seed, rather than seed from more distant sources on the grounds that it is likely to be best adapted to the locality. But what does ‘local’ mean ? One objective of the FRAXIGEN project was to provide scientific evidence to answer the question: “How local is local ?”

They attempted to establish whether ash stands show local adaptation, and, if so, over what geographic scale ? How much similarity exists between woods ? Are neighbouring ash stands more similar than distant ones ? FRAXIGEN addressed these questions through a combination of field and laboratory studies.

Some of the key outcomes of the research are:

  • While material should not be transferred over very large latitudinal, or longitudinal ranges, provenance delimitation for ash can operate at the scale of at least 200-300 km without compromising local adaptation, i.e. good seed sources can be moved to other sites within this range without adversely affecting their performance. This is in marked contrast to recommendations in current Forestry Commission guidelines (Practice Note on Using local stock for planting native trees and shrubs of August 1999).
  • High levels of gene flow between stands provide evidence against subdividing large provenance regions into small zones for seed collection.
  • Native populations of ash in Britain have high levels of genetic variation. They are not threatened, or in need of specific conservation programmes.
  • Nevertheless, seed collectors should observe the following recommendations, to maintain local genetic diversity without affecting future productivity and adaptability:
    • Collect seed from at least 10 trees
    • Collect at least 500 seeds per tree
    • Seed trees should be at least 150 m apart
    • Collections can be from female, or hermaphrodite trees, and in either mast, or non-mast years, without reducing genetic diversity.

 

THE NURSERYMAN'S POINT OF VIEW

There is a current movement to encourage the planting of trees and shrubs from “native” seed sources. Why is this encouraged and what effect is this having on the nursery industry?

  • The Forestry Commission seed zones are arbitrary and drawn up geographically. They take no account of soil conditions, altitude or pH. We are situated in the centre of the country where 4 seed zones cross over – are we really expected to keep stocks of all the many types of trees and hedging from all of these seed areas?
  • With the change from Countryside Stewardship to ELS reducing the amount of hedge planting and the introduction of the new EWGS, that does little for the encouragement of new tree planting, many nurseries are finding life tough enough, without the extra problems of “nativeness”.
  • To qualify for “native”, the seed must be collected from a tree within a certain zone, but there is no check on the tree to see whether it was “native” initially ! (I know of several instances of nurseries collecting “native” Hawthorn seed for growing that can be classed as “Native English Provenance”, but they know full well that they supplied the plants several years previously and that they were of Italian origin.)
  • We are trying to produce the best plants for the purpose at the cheapest price – to do this in the case of Hawthorn it is best to use non-native seed origins. They grow better, stronger, more healthy and has more mildew resistance, and hence use less chemicals in their production. We have both types of Hawthorn growing together as a transplant crop and every year without fail the “native” Hawthorn is smaller, weaker and has more Mildew.
  • Climate Change. We should be planting trees and hedging that will be better suited to the climate in the future. This is most likely to be a climate similar to Northern Italy.
  • Who really cares ? 95% of our customers want the best quality plants and aren’t really interested in where they come from, as long as they will grow and thrive.

Luckily we are only asked very occasionally for “native” origin plants – most of our customers are pleased to receive high quality plants – so we do not suffer personally, but I sympathise with many other nurseries.

We should concentrate on producing the high quality plants that the industry is known for, that will grow in the conditions in which they are put, rather than worrying about the exact location that the seeds may have come from.

Niel Nicholson, Nicholson Nurseries Ltd